Abstract
BackgroundAlthough the number of models for predicting the risk of cancer-associated thrombosis has been rising, there is still a lack of comprehensive assessment for machine learning prediction models. ObjectivesThis study aimed to critically appraise and quantify the performance studies using machine learning to predict cancer-associated thrombosis. MethodsWe conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and other related databases for the related publications (from inception to December 1, 2023). The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool checklist was employed to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence in systematic reviews. Meta-analyses were conducted using R (version 4.3.2). ResultsA total of 32 studies were included. Mostly included literature exhibited a high risk of bias, and the applicability of the prediction models was deemed acceptable. The 21 included studies in the meta-analysis demonstrated the high predictive capacity of the machine learning models for cancer-associated thrombosis. ConclusionMost of the prediction models included in the study showed good applicability and excellent prediction performance, but there was a high risk of bias.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have