Abstract

PMMA and PET thin films doped with (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc {(t- Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA and (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PET} and PMMA thin film doped with (t-bu)<SUB>1</SUB>. <SUB>4</SUB>VOPc {(t-Bu)<SUB>1</SUB>. <SUB>4</SUB> VOPc PMMA} were prepared on glass substrate by coating (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA and (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPcPET were treated with dichloroethane vapor in a desiccator at room temperature. On the other hand, (t-Bu)<SUB>1</SUB>. <SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA was treated with dichloroethane and chloroform vapor in the desiccator at room temperature. The (t-Bu)<SUB>1</SUB>. <SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA and (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA thin films showed SHG and THG after vapor treatment but (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PET thin film did not. These suggest that the degree of swelling by dichloroethane vapor are different between PMMA and PET. In other words, the aggregation of (t-Bu<SUB>4</SUB>) VOPc occurs more easily in PMMA than in PET. The THG of (t-Bu)<SUB>1</SUB>. <SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA thin film is larger than that of a (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc PMMA thin film. This means that the molecular size of (t-Bu)<SUB>1</SUB>. <SUB>4</SUB>VOPc is smaller than that of the size of (t-Bu)<SUB>4</SUB>VOPc.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call