Abstract
The goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
