Abstract

We now turn to lowness notions for other notions of randomness. We begin with Schnorr randomness. Since there is no universal Schnorr test, it is not clear that the notions of a set A being low for Schnorr randomness (i.e.,every Schnorr random set is Schnorr random relative to A) and being low for Schnorr tests (i.e., every Schnorr test relative to A can be covered by an unrelativized Schnorr test1) should be the same. In fact, this was an open question in Ambos-Spies and Kucera [9]. As we will see, it was solved by Kjos-Hanssen, Nies, and Stephan [207].

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.