Abstract

BackgroundIndividuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability. MethodsFifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05. FindingsIndividuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (p < 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (p < 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (p < 0.03). InterpretationIndividuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.