Abstract
Unfair treatment may evoke more negative emotions in individuals scoring higher on neuroticism, thereby possibly impacting their decision-making in these situations. To investigate the neural basis of social decision-making in these individuals, we examined interpersonal reactions to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game (UG). We measured brain activation with fMRI in 120 participants selected based on their neuroticism score, while they made decisions to accept or reject proposals that were either fair or unfair. The anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex were more activated during the processing of unfair offers, consistent with prior UG studies. Furthermore, we found more activation in parietal and temporal regions for the two most common decisions (fair accept and unfair reject), involving areas related to perceptual decision-making. Conversely, during the decision to accept unfair offers, individuals recruited more frontal regions previously associated with decision-making and the implementation of reappraisal in the UG. High compared to low neurotic individuals did not show differential activation patterns during the proposal of unfair offers; however, they did show lower activation in the right dorsal striatum (putamen) during the acceptance of unfair offers. This brain region has been involved in the formation of stimulus–action–reward associations and motivation/arousal. In conclusion, the findings suggest that both high and low neurotic individuals recruit brain regions signaling social norm violations in response to unfair offers. However, when it comes to decision-making, it seems that neural circuitry related to reward and motivation is altered in individuals scoring higher on neuroticism, when accepting an unfair offer.
Highlights
Unfair treatment may evoke more negative emotions in individuals scoring higher on neuroticism, thereby possibly impacting their decision-making in these situations
The aim of the current study was to investigate the association between neuroticism and brain activation during the perception of social norm violations and social decision-making in the Ultimatum Game (UG), in response to unfair offers
The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between neuroticism and brain activation during the perception of social norm violations and social decision-making in the UG, in response to unfair offers
Summary
Unfair treatment may evoke more negative emotions in individuals scoring higher on neuroticism, thereby possibly impacting their decision-making in these situations. Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands offers When it comes to decision-making, it seems that neural circuitry related to reward and motivation is altered in individuals scoring higher on neuroticism, when accepting an unfair offer. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2015) 15:537–552 avoidance and revenge motivations after an interpersonal conflict and are less forgiving (Brose, Rye, Lutz-Zois, & Ross, 2005; Maltby et al, 2008) These findings indicate that individuals scoring higher on neuroticism experience more emotional problems in dealing with interpersonal conflicts, which may impact their decision-making in these situations
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have