Abstract

The trait-based approach to ecology promises to provide a mechanistic understanding of species distributions and ecosystem functioning. Typically, trait analyses focus on average species trait values and assume that intraspecific variation is small or negligible. Recent work has shown, however, that intraspecific trait variation can often contribute substantially to total trait variation. Whilst many studies have investigated intraspecific variation in plants, very few have done so for invertebrates. There is no research on the level of intraspecific trait variation in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), despite the fact that there is a growing body of literature using ant morphological trait data and demonstrating that these insects play important roles in many ecosystems and food webs. Here, we investigate the intraspecific variability of four commonly used ant morphological traits from 23 species from the Maloti-Drakensberg Mountains of southern Africa. In total, we measured 1145 different individuals and made 6870 trait measurements. Intraspecific variation accounted for only 1–4% of total trait variation for each of the four traits we analysed. We found no links between intraspecific variation, phylogeny and elevation. On average, six individuals generated robust species means but under biased sampling scenarios 20 individuals were needed. The low levels of intraspecific morphological variation that we find suggest that the approach of using mean species traits is valid, in this fauna at least. Regardless, we encourage ant trait ecologists to measure greater numbers of individuals, especially across gradients, to shed further light on intraspecific variation in this functionally important group of insects.

Highlights

  • A major goal of ecology is to understand the geographic distribution of biodiversity and its role in maintaining functioning ecosystems

  • Our study builds on previous work quantifying the intraspecific variability of traits

  • Little is known about intraspecific variability in invertebrates, and even less about its importance in ants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A major goal of ecology is to understand the geographic distribution of biodiversity and its role in maintaining functioning ecosystems. By focussing on species’ trait means, and ignoring within-species trait variation, analyses risk exaggerating interspecific differences and underestimating niche overlap and breadth (Bolnick et al 2011; Violle et al 2012). This may lead to researchers drawing false conclusions about the underlying mechanisms shaping biodiversity patterns.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call