Abstract

Identifying the primary causes affecting population densities and distribution of flagship species are necessary in developing sustainable management strategies for large carnivore conservation. We modeled drivers of spatial density of the common leopard (Panthera pardus) using a spatially explicit capture–recapture—Bayesian approach to understand their population dynamics in the Maputaland Conservation Unit, South Africa. We camera‐trapped leopards in four protected areas (PAs) of varying sizes and disturbance levels covering 198 camera stations. Ours is the first study to explore the effects of poaching level, abundance of prey species (small, medium, and large), competitors (lion Panthera leo and spotted hyenas Crocuta crocuta), and habitat on the spatial distribution of common leopard density. Twenty‐six male and 41 female leopards were individually identified and estimated leopard density ranged from 1.6 ± 0.62/100 km2 (smallest PA—Ndumo) to 8.4 ± 1.03/100 km2 (largest PA—western shores). Although dry forest thickets and plantation habitats largely represented the western shores, the plantation areas had extremely low leopard density compared to native forest. We found that leopard density increased in areas when low poaching levels/no poaching was recorded in dry forest thickets and with high abundance of medium‐sized prey, but decreased with increasing abundance of lion. Because local leopard populations are vulnerable to extinction, particularly in smaller PAs, the long‐term sustainability of leopard populations depend on developing appropriate management strategies that consider a combination of multiple factors to maintain their optimal habitats.

Highlights

  • Large wide-­ranging carnivores naturally occur at low densities due to their slow recruitment rates and specialized habitat requirements (Gros, Kelly, & Caro, 1996; Hayward, O’Brien, & Kerley, 2007; Karanth, Nichols, Kumar, Link, & Hines, 2004; Ray, Hunter, & Zigouris, 2005)

  • Our systematic camera-­trap surveys and analyses using the robust Bayesian-­Spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) approach under the mark–recapture framework estimated the density of common leopard populations in protected areas (PAs) of Maputaland Conservation Unit (MCU)

  • Ours is the first and the most extensive study to estimate the density of common leopard in South Africa, following the Bayesian-­SECR approach as a function of camera site-­specific covariates

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Carnivore density is positively correlated with prey abundance (Karanth et al, 2004), additive effects of competing top predators may impact populations of other predators through kleptoparasitism, injury, and direct mortality (Caro & Stoner, 2003; Donadio & Buskirk, 2006; Mills & Mills, 1982) Such competition can reduce the population size of an endangered carnivore through risk of dominant competitors that are larger or live in competitively dominant social groups; for instance, lions (Panthera leo) and spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) have negative impacts on populations of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) (Creel & Creel, 1996; Durant, 2000), and leopard (Mills, 2015). Our study resulted in significant conservation implications for understanding those multiscale factors affecting carnivore populations, which are applicable worldwide

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call