Abstract
In this review essay, I discuss how, in writing this book on how thinking is feeling, Donovan Schaefer is having a passionate love affair with an idea, how he pulls the bow string as far and still not enough to the point of breaking. I have three remarks/points of concern/comments specific to the outline of cogency theory. First, how thinking is feeling? If thinking is feeling is a process, how does it happen? Second, where does reframing science/knowledge as thinking is feeling take us? How can it reframe what we mean by science? And last, who is the thinking-feeling scientist-subject?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
