Abstract
IntroductionAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We compared long-term outcome and quality of life (QOL) in ICU patients with AKI treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) with matched non-AKI-RRT patients.MethodsOver 1 year, consecutive adult ICU patients were included in a prospective cohort study. AKI-RRT patients alive at 1 year and 4 years were matched with non-AKI-RRT survivors from the same cohort in a 1:2 (1 year) and 1:1 (4 years) ratio based on gender, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and admission category. QOL was assessed by the EuroQoL-5D and the Short Form-36 survey before ICU admission and at 3 months, 1 and 4 years after ICU discharge.ResultsOf 1953 patients, 121 (6.2 %) had AKI-RRT. AKI-RRT hospital survivors (44.6 %; N = 54) had a 1-year and 4-year survival rate of 87.0 % (N = 47) and 64.8 % (N = 35), respectively. Forty-seven 1-year AKI-RRT patients were matched with 94 1-year non-AKI-RRT patients. Of 35 4-year survivors, three refused further cooperation, three were lost to follow-up, and one had no control. Finally, 28 4-year AKI-RRT patients were matched with 28 non-AKI-RRT patients. During ICU stay, 1-year and 4-year AKI-RRT patients had more organ dysfunction compared to their respective matches (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores 7 versus 5, P < 0.001, and 7 versus 4, P < 0.001). Long-term QOL was, however, comparable between both groups but lower than in the general population. QOL decreased at 3 months, improved after 1 and 4 years but remained under baseline level. One and 4 years after ICU discharge, 19.1 % and 28.6 % of AKI-RRT survivors remained RRT-dependent, respectively, and 81.8 % and 71 % of them were willing to undergo ICU admission again if needed.ConclusionIn long-term critically ill AKI-RRT survivors, QOL was comparable to matched long-term critically ill non-AKI-RRT survivors, but lower than in the general population. The majority of AKI-RRT patients wanted to be readmitted to the ICU when needed, despite a higher severity of illness compared to matched non-AKI-RRT patients, and despite the fact that one quarter had persistent dialysis dependency.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1004-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality
Forty-seven 1-year AKI-renal replacement therapy (RRT) survivors were individually matched with 94 1-year non-AKI-RRT survivors
Preferred to be readmitted to an ICU department in case of deterioration versus 83.0 % of their 1-year matches (P = 0.867). This number decreased to 71.4 % for the 4-year AKI-RRT patients versus 84.6 % for the 4-year non-AKI-RRT patients (P = 0.244). In this prospective, single-center matched cohort study concerning long-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) of AKI-RRT patients, we found high mortality rates and lower QOL levels compared to the general population
Summary
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. AKI-RRT patients show that these patients have a decreased QOL compared to the general population but perceive QOL as good [12, 13] These studies were either retrospective [14,15,16,17], evaluated QOL after a short term [12,13,14,15, 17,18,19,20,21], lacked baseline QOL assessment [12,13,14,15, 18, 22], or dated back more than a decade [14,15,16, 18, 23]. It is unclear whether impairment in long-term QOL is the consequences of critical illness, AKI-RRT, pre-existing co-morbidities, or a combination of these
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.