Abstract
The lesion sets for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) that provide optimal outcomes have remained controversial. We evaluated the effects of left-atrial (LA) ablation of AF compared with bi-atrial (BA) ablation on the clinical and rhythm outcomes, and examined the predictors for AF recurrence and permanent pacing in consideration of ablation lesion sets. Between 2001 and 2018, 1,965 patients underwent surgical ablation during cardiac surgery at our institution. Among these, 796 and 1,169 patients underwent LA and BA ablation, respectively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated after propensity score adjustment, with death accounting for a competing event. The probability of AF recurrence was estimated with the generalized estimating equations model. The patients with BA ablation had morbidities greater than those with LA ablation. The probability of AF recurrence at 1 and 5 years was 13.9% and 37.1% in patients with LA ablation, and 11.2% and 30.1% in those with BA ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.61; P=0.100). After adjustment, LA ablation was associated with a decreased risk of early death (<30days) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.31-0.96; P=0.041) and new-onset dialysis (OR 0.47; 95%CI: 0.27-0.78; P=0.003). However, the risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.03; 95%CI: 0.75-1.41; P=0.878) and permanent pacing (HR: 0.68; 95%CI: 0.43-1.06; P=0.091) was comparable between the 2groups. The risk of AF recurrence and adverse events was comparable between the 2 ablation lesion sets. BA ablation was not related to an increased risk of permanent pacing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.