Abstract

An aim of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research is to identify early biomarkers that inform ASD pathophysiology and expedite detection. Brain oscillations captured in electroencephalography (EEG) are thought to be disrupted as core ASD pathophysiology. We leverage longitudinal EEG power measurements from 3 to 36 months of age in infants at low- and high-risk for ASD to test how and when power distinguishes ASD risk and diagnosis by age 3-years. Power trajectories across the first year, second year, or first three years postnatally were submitted to data-driven modeling to differentiate ASD outcomes. Power dynamics during the first postnatal year best differentiate ASD diagnoses. Delta and gamma frequency power trajectories consistently distinguish infants with ASD diagnoses from others. There is also a developmental shift across timescales towards including higher-frequency power to differentiate outcomes. These findings reveal the importance of developmental timing and trajectory in understanding pathophysiology and classifying ASD outcomes.

Highlights

  • An aim of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research is to identify early biomarkers that inform ASD pathophysiology and expedite detection

  • We focus on frontal EEG pathophysiology across three key developmental windows: the first year, antecedent to behavioral symptoms; the second year, concurrent with emerging behavioral symptoms; and the three year period including the age of confirmed ASD diagnosis

  • One major unresolved goal in ASD research is the identification of early biomarkers that reveal the underlying pathophysiology differentiating subsequent diagnostic outcomes[8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An aim of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research is to identify early biomarkers that inform ASD pathophysiology and expedite detection. Compared to other cortical regions, frontal EEG power consistently demonstrates differences in theta, alpha, and gamma bands during the second year postnatally that have been associated with a range of ASD symptom domains in this elevated-risk population, including sensory hyporesponsiveness, cognitive deficits, language, and the degree of restricted and repetitive behaviors[9,10,12,13,14,15,16] It remains to be determined how well early EEG differences can distinguish subsequent ASD outcomes. We identify which EEG frequency bands and their developmental trajectories differentiate groups as potential diagnostic biomarkers, and whether these measures’ identities change across the three developmental windows In these ways, we aim to illuminate the EEG power measures and developmental timing that provide the most robust differentiation of ASD risk and diagnoses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call