Long-term survival after TAVR in patients with low flow-low gradient vs high gradient aortic valve stenosis

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the treatment of choice in elderly patients affected by severe aortic stenosis (AS). In patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS, a clear benefit of TAVR over conservative treatment has been demonstrated. Notwithstanding, patients with classical LFLG (cLFLG) AS have shown worse early post-procedural outcomes compared to those with high-gradient (HG) AS. Purpose Given the absence of data, we aimed to evaluate long-term survival (up to 10 years) after TAVR in patients with cLFLG and paradoxical LFLG (pLFLG) AS as compared to those with HG-AS. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at our center with a minimum 5-year follow up (i.e. treated between June 2007 and December 2016) were considered for this analysis. According to baseline echocardiography, patients were divided in three groups: 1) HG-AS (MG >40 mmHg); 2) cLFLG-AS (MG <40 mmHg, EF <50%); and 3) pLFLG-AS (MG <40 mmHg, EF >50%). The study endpoint was post-procedural all-cause mortality. To test differences in long-term outcomes among groups, survival curves using the Kaplan Meier estimator were plotted and compared with the log-rank test. To adjust for possible baseline confounders, a propensity score weighted survival analysis was then performed (standard mean deviation <0.1 for all the considered covariates). Results A total of 574 subjects were included in the analysis (419 [73%] HG-AS; 91 [15%] pLFLG-AS; and 64 [11%] cLFLG-AS). Median survival time was 4.8 years [IQR 2.3–6.2], with a maximum of 12.3 years. Patients with cLFLG-AS presented higher baseline cardiovascular risk compared to those with both HG-AS and pLFLG-AS. At unadjusted survival analysis, patients with cLFLG-AS showed the worst long-term prognosis after TAVR (overall log-rank test p=0.023). However, after propensity weighted adjustment, the long-term survival of patients with cLFLG-AS was similar to those with HG-AS (p=0.77). Patients with pLFLG and HG-AS presented similar survival rate. Unadjusted (Panels A and C) and adjusted (Panels B and D) survival curves are reported in Figure 1. Out of 64 patients with cLFLG-AS, 43 (67%) presented an improvement in LV-EF (>15% from the baseline value) within the first year after TAVR. LV-EF improvement, but not baseline LV-EF, was apparently related to longer post-TAVR survival (Figure 2). Conclusion In the current study, patients with cLFLG-AS had worse long-term survival after TARV as compared to either HG or pLFLG-AS subjects. This difference was not present after adjusting for possible baseline confounders. Thus, the low-flow state condition per se might have a lower impact on long term prognosis of TAVR patients than previously hypothesized. Post-TAVR LV-EF recovery was common among patients with cLFLG-AS and was associated with improved long-term survival. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.