Abstract

Background: Treatment of cholangitis complicating choledocholithiasis includes biliary sphincterotomy and stone extraction. In certain cases of elderly comorbid patients with high risk for definitive endoscopic treatment, biliary stenting is the only measure for relieving biliary obstruction. Aim: We aimed to report the safety of retained biliary stone. Methods: a multi-center, retrospective case-control study conducted at two Israeli medical centers from January 2013 to December 2018 including all patients 18 years of age or older who underwent ERCP and biliary stent insertion for the treatment of acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis. Results: Three-hundred and eight patients were identified. Eighty-three patients had retained long-term biliary stents of more than 6 months (group A) from insertion compared to 225 patients whose biliary stents were removed within a 6-month period (group B). The mean follow-up in group A was 66.1± 16.3 vs. 11.1 ± 2.7 weeks in group B. Overall complications during the follow-up were similar between groups A and B (6% vs. 4.9%, OR 1.24, Chi square 0.69). Similarly, the rate of each complication alone was not different when comparing group A to group B (3.6%, 1.2% and 1.2% vs. 2.7%, 0.44% and 1.8%) for cholangitis, stent related pancreatitis and biliary colic, respectively (Chi square 0.85). Even after 12 months, the rates of overall complications and each complication alone were not higher compared to less than 12 months (Chi square 0.72 and 0.8, respectively). Conclusion: endoscopic biliary stenting for cholangitis complicating choledocholithiasis is safe for the long-term period without increase in stent related complications.

Highlights

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered an essential procedure for the treatment of numerous pancreatic and biliary tract conditions [1], mainly used for the management of choledocholithiasis complications [2,3]

  • Eighty-three patients who underwent urgent ERCP for acute cholangitis complicating choledocholithiasis with biliary stent insertion mostly without papillotomy or with papillotomy when stone extraction was attempted, had retained long-term biliary stents of more than 6 months from insertion vs. 225 patients whose biliary stents were removed within 6 months following the index ERCP, (Figure 1)

  • Our study demonstrated that approximately 10% of patients who underwent ERCP due to cholangitis complicating choledocholithiasis in the long-term and even over 12 and 18 months in the secondary endpoints, retained biliary stents and were not associated with more overall complications or any specific complication including cholangitis, pancreatitis and biliary colic compared to stent duration of less than 6 months

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered an essential procedure for the treatment of numerous pancreatic and biliary tract conditions [1], mainly used for the management of choledocholithiasis complications [2,3]. Given the paucity of data regarding retained biliary stents beyond the recommended period of extraction or replacement, we aimed to report our experience regarding the long-term safety and complications of retained biliary stents in elderly patients hospitalized with cholangitis complicating choledocholithiasis and treated by biliary stenting. Methods: a multi-center, retrospective case-control study conducted at two Israeli medical centers from January 2013 to December 2018 including all patients 18 years of age or older who underwent ERCP and biliary stent insertion for the treatment of acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis. The rate of each complication alone was not different when comparing group A to group B (3.6%, 1.2% and 1.2% vs 2.7%, 0.44% and 1.8%) for cholangitis, stent related pancreatitis and biliary colic, respectively (Chi square 0.85). Conclusion: endoscopic biliary stenting for cholangitis complicating choledocholithiasis is safe for the long-term period without increase in stent related complications

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call