Abstract

A key aspect of transferrable oil and gas expertise to Subsurface CO 2 Storage (SCS) relates to risk assessment. While initial subsurface risk and volume assessments for SCS projects are similar to oil and gas prospect evaluations, full lifecycle risk assessment requires evaluation of the current knowledge of the storage complex and future potential events that may have impacts over long timeframes. It is important to learn from past water, gas and CO 2 injection and storage projects, examples of which are reviewed here. The concepts of aleatory and epistemic risk and uncertainty are discussed and the use of standard risk matrices for evaluation of long-term, low frequency but potentially high impact events is challenged. Drawing on the large volume of previous work, this paper highlights key elements for development of a robust risking framework, including thorough project framing and implementation of a staged approach to project execution. The paper assesses methods for ensuring all potential hazards are captured and addresses the challenges of defining a quantitative risking scale suitable for long-term SCS projects. Example quantitative risk profiles can be used to calculate the timing and duration of ‘Peak Risk’, augment monitoring and mitigation planning for management of risk and capital exposure and help ensure successful project outcomes. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geoscience workflows for CO 2 storage collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/geoscience-workflows-for-CO2-storage

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call