Abstract

Renal safety is a critical issue in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving long-term entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disofuroxil fumarate (TDF) therapy. We investigated their effects on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Treatment-naive CHB patients receiving ETV or TDF for ≥1year were recruited. The eGFR was assessed using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. We calculated average annual percent change (AAPC) in eGFR using Joinpoint regression. At the beginning of the observation, the ETV group had more unfavorable conditions than the TDF group: lower eGFR and higher FIB-4 and APRI than the TDF group (all p<.001). After 6years of antiviral therapy, the mean eGFR in the ETV group (n=1793) was maintained (96.0 at first year to 95.6ml/min/1.73m2 at sixth year; AAPC -0.09%; p=.322), whereas that in the TDF group (n=1240) significantly decreased annually (101.9 at first year to 96.9ml/min/1.73m2 at sixth year; AAPC -0.88%; p<.001). Notably, in the TDF group, even patients without diabetes (AAPC -0.80%; p=0.001) or hypertension (AAPC -0.87%; p=.001) experienced significant decrease in eGFR. Expectably, accompanying diabetes (AAPC -1.59%; p=.011) or hypertension (AAPC -1.00%; p=.002) tended to accelerate eGFR decrease. TDF treatment (odds ratio 1.66, p<.001), along with eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 , serum albumin<3.5mg/dl, and hypertension, were independently associated with ongoing renal dysfunction, defined as a negative slope of the mean eGFR change. In conclusion, compared with ETV, long-term TDF treatment induced slow, but progressive renal dysfunction. Although the annual eGFR change by TDF was small, careful monitoring is necessary, especially in patients requiring life-long therapy.

Highlights

  • Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem affecting approximately 257 million people worldwide [1]

  • Two prominent oral nucleos[t]ide analogue (NUC) with high antiviral efficacy and minimal resistance, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), are recommended in the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) according to the clinical guidelines [4,5,6]

  • There have been several studies reporting no difference in renal function between patients treated with tenofovir disofuroxil fumarate (TDF) and those treated with ETV during a relatively short observation period [14, 15, 24, 25], TDF has the inherent potential to be nephrotoxic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem affecting approximately 257 million people worldwide [1]. Suppression of HBDNA through antiviral therapy (AVT) using oral nucleos[t]ide analogues (NUCs) has become the major basis for treatment of HBV infection [4,5,6,7,8]. Two prominent oral NUCs with high antiviral efficacy and minimal resistance, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), are recommended in the initial treatment of CHB according to the clinical guidelines [4,5,6]. Renal safety is a critical issue in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving long-term entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disofuroxil fumarate (TDF) therapy. We investigated their effects on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.