Abstract

This recently published interesting paper [1] showed statistically significant reduction (P < .005) in congestion of inferior turbinate mucosa in 2 groups of post-total laryngectomy patients over a period of time (group 1; less than 12 months, group 2; 12–36 months). I am intrigued as to which statistical test was used to calculate this and the other P values, since it was not mentioned in the study. Also, I wonder what the authors' and readers' opinions are with regards to the time intervals at which biopsies were taken postoperatively. Could the other histological indices have born a statistically significant difference between the groups, where shorter time intervals are to be used (e.g., 3, 6, and 9 months)? The references cited by the authors themselves certainly do not seem to observe any standard established time frames. It would be interesting to gauge readers' opinion on these matters.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.