Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report the results from a study that investigated the extent to which an intervention to develop a community of library and information science (LIS) researchers – the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project – was successful in meeting its main objective three years after its implementation. Of particular interest are factors that support or hinder network longevity.Design/methodology/approachData were collected by online survey/telephone and focus group. From quantitative data, a social network analysis (SNA) and network diagrams were generated. Focus group discussions were recorded and transcribed, and data from these were analysed manually.FindingsThree years after the end of its formal funding period, DREaM endured as a loose but persistent network. Social ties were more important than work ties, and network members with the highest network centrality held roles in academic institutions. Physical proximity between members was important to the maintenance of network ties. Actor status did not appear to have a bearing on network centrality.Research limitations/implicationsDiscussion is limited to consideration of community development amongst core members of the network only. The “manufactured” nature of the DREaM network and unique context in which it was formed have implications for the generalisibility of the findings reported.Practical implicationsSocial infrastructure is key to the long-term health of a network initiative. Continued ad hoc support would strengthen it further.Originality/valueThe findings add to understanding of factors important to the development of scholarly and learning communities. They extend contributions of earlier work that has deployed SNA techniques in LIS research and research in other fields.
Highlights
The broad goal of the AHRC-funded Developing Research and Excellence Methods (DREaM) project was to develop a UK-wide network of library and information science (LIS) researchers
These findings reveal that positions of network centrality in the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) network are less associated with status as has been reported elsewhere (Dimitrova, Wellman, Gruz, Hayat, Mo, Mok, Robbins and Zhuo, 2013, pp. 309-310)
Taking into consideration the limitations of the context of the network under scrutiny as identified above, DREaM Again adds to the understanding of factors that are important to scholarly and learning network development
Summary
The broad goal of the AHRC-funded Developing Research and Excellence Methods (DREaM) project was to develop a UK-wide network of library and information science (LIS) researchers. The analysis of the data collected from these two exercises allowed for an examination of the impact of the DREaM project as a whole, as well as consideration of the extent to which those 32 academics, researchers, practitioner researchers, and PhD students in 2012 (known as ‘the cadre’) who had participated in the workshops continued to operate as a community three years after its formal completion. It was possible over the course of this second project to verify anecdotal reports of the impact of DREaM. The article concludes with a summary of the main contributions of the work, and an indication of further on-going research related to the DREaM network
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Accepted Version (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call