Abstract
Approximately 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients are found to be dissatisfied or unsure of their satisfaction at 1-year post-surgery. This study attempted to predict 1-year post-surgery dissatisfied/unsure TKA patients with pre-surgery and surgical variables using logistic regression and machine learning methods. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2016 at a single institution was completed. Patients were split into satisfied and dissatisfied/unsure groups. Potential predictor variables included the following: demographic information, patella re-surfaced, posterior collateral ligament sacrificed, and subscales from the Knee Society Knee Scoring System, the Knee Society Clinical Rating System, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2. Logistic regression and 6 different machine learning methods were used to create prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination (AUC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve]) and calibration (Brier score, Cox intercept, and Cox slope) metrics. There were 1432 eligible patients included in the analysis, 313 were considered to be dissatisfied/unsure. When evaluating discrimination, the logistic regression (AUC= 0.736) and extreme gradient boosted tree (AUC= 0.713) models performed best. When evaluating calibration, the logistic regression (Brier score= 0.141, Cox intercept= 0.241, and Cox slope= 1.31) and gradient boosted tree (Brier score= 0.149, Cox intercept= 0.054, and Cox slope= 1.158) models performed best. The models developed in this study do not perform well enough as discriminatory tools to be used in a clinical setting. Further work needs to be done to improve the performance of pre-surgery TKA dissatisfaction prediction models.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have