Abstract

AbstractErosion in loess is a widespread phenomenon, as loess covers about 10% of the Earth's land surface. While erosion of loess soil has been intensively studied, the mechanisms controlling erosion in gullies and pipes in loess are poorly understood. Cohesion plays an important role in erosion in loess. Interactions between erosional processes and stabilizing mechanisms in loess are poorly understood. This study focuses on the interaction between air slaking and stabilization by confinement to improve leaching techniques for identifying cohesion sources in undisturbed loess from four sites in Czechia. The decrease in tensile strength of samples after leaching in distilled water, dithionate, HCl, and hydrogen peroxide was used to selectively remove cohesion sources such as Fe‐Al oxides and hydroxides, carbonates, and organic matter. Experiments showed that confinement and overburden stress are important but neglected stabilizing mechanisms in loess. Leaching of unconfined loess samples gave misleading results because of ubiquitous air slaking. To reliably identify cohesion sources, samples confined in compacted sand were used. Leaching of confined samples showed that Fe‐Al oxides and hydroxides are major sources of cohesion (60–90%), while carbonates and organic matter are of minor importance (0–30%). To avoid misleading results, examination of loess structure after leaching is critical to identify samples with damaged structure due to enhanced air slaking caused by bubbles generated during leaching. Air slaking is a powerful and rapid damage mechanism, but it occurs only in dry or semi‐dry loess near the soil surface. In contrast, chemical weathering is able to remove cohesion sources in deeper parts of the loess profile.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call