Locally optimized correlation-guided Bayesian adaptive regularization for ultrasound strain imaging

Abstract

Ultrasound strain imaging utilizes radio-frequency (RF) ultrasound echo signals to estimate the relative elasticity of tissue under deformation. Due to the diagnostic value inherent in tissue elasticity, ultrasound strain imaging has found widespread clinical and preclinical applications. Accurate displacement estimation using pre and post-deformation RF signals is a crucial first step to derive high quality strain tensor images. Incorporating regularization into the displacement estimation framework is a commonly employed strategy to improve estimation accuracy and precision. In this work, we propose an adaptive variation of the iterative Bayesian regularization scheme utilizing RF similarity metric signal-to-noise ratio previously proposed by our group. The regularization scheme is incorporated into a 2D multi-level block matching (BM) algorithm for motion estimation. Adaptive nature of our algorithm is attributed to the dynamic variation of iteration number based on the normalized cross-correlation (NCC) function quality and a similarity measure between pre-deformation and motion compensated post-deformation RF signals. The proposed method is validated for either quasi-static and cardiac elastography or strain imaging applications using uniform and inclusion phantoms and canine cardiac deformation simulation models. Performance of adaptive Bayesian regularization was compared to conventional NCC and Bayesian regularization with fixed number of iterations. Results from uniform phantom simulation study show significant improvement in lateral displacement and strain estimation accuracy. For instance, at 1.5% lateral strain in a uniform phantom, Bayesian regularization with five iterations incurred a lateral strain error of 104.49%, which was significantly reduced using our adaptive approach to 27.51% (p < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise (CNRe) ratios obtained from inclusion phantom indicate improved lesion detectability for both axial and lateral strain images. For instance, at 1.5% lateral strain, Bayesian regularization with five iterations had lateral CNRe of −0.31 dB which was significantly increased using the adaptive approach to 7.42 dB (p < 0.001). Similar results are seen with cardiac deformation modelling with improvement in myocardial strain images. In vivo feasibility was also demonstrated using data from a healthy murine heart. Overall, the proposed method makes Bayesian regularization robust for clinical and preclinical applications.