Abstract

This study presents a plan for seismic monitoring of a region around a potential nuclear power plant. Seismic monitoring is needed to evaluate seismic risk. The International Atomic Energy Agency has set guidelines on seismic hazard evaluation and monitoring of such areas. According to these guidelines, we have made a plan for a local network of seismic stations to collect data for seismic source characterization and seismotectonic interpretations, as well as to monitor seismic activity and natural hazards. The detection and location capability of the network were simulated using different station configurations by computing spatial azimuthal coverages and detection threshold magnitudes. Background noise conditions around Pyhäjoki were analyzed by comparing data from different stations. The annual number of microearthquakes that should be detected with a dense local network centered around Pyhäjoki was estimated. The network should be dense enough to fulfill the requirements of azimuthal coverage better than 180° and automatic event location capability down to ML ∼ 0 within a distance of 25 km from the site. A network of 10 stations should be enough to reach these goals. With this setup, the detection threshold magnitudes are estimated to be ML = −0.1 and ML = 0.1 within a radius of 25 and 50 km from Pyhäjoki, respectively. The annual number of earthquakes detected by the network is estimated to be 2 (ML ≥ ∼ −0.1) within 25 km radius and 5 (ML ≥ ∼−0.1 to ∼0.1) within 50 km radius. The location accuracy within 25 km radius is estimated to be 1–2 and 4 km for horizontal coordinates and depth, respectively. Thus, the network is dense enough to map out capable faults with horizontal accuracy of 1–2 km within 25 km radius of the site. The estimation is based on the location accuracies of five existing networks in northern Europe. Local factors, such as seismic noise sources, geology and infrastructure might limit the station configuration and detection and location capability of the network.

Highlights

  • Sites of nuclear power plants must be evaluated for seismic risk and monitored for seismicity (IAEA, 3.30, 2010)

  • Pyhäjoki is situated in the Central part of the Fennoscandian Shield, a region characterized by low intraplate seismicity (Fig. 1)

  • Seismotectonic interpretation and seismic hazard evaluation can be improved with a larger amount of accurately located earthquakes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sites of nuclear power plants must be evaluated for seismic risk and monitored for seismicity (IAEA, 3.30, 2010). There are many methods for estimation of the lowest magnitude of events that a seismic network is able to detect (Sereno and Bratt 1989; Gomberg 1991; Woessner and Wiemer 2005; Schorlemmer and Woessner 2008) They are usually used to evaluate the performance of an existing seismic network or completeness of an earthquake catalog. The event detection and location performance of a local seismic network around Pyhäjoki will be simulated and recommendations on the optimal configuration of the network will be given. Based on the roughly similar levels of background noise in the KULN and Pyhäjoki areas, the network around Pyhäjoki is expected to have similar ability to record small earthquakes and other seismic events as KULN

Automatic location system of ISUH
Seismicity statistics for Pyhäjoki area
Simulation of automatic networks
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call