Abstract

Most studies on tourism destination competitiveness examined the direct relationships of destination attributes and destination competitiveness. Few studies explored the intervening mechanisms between destination attributes and competitiveness. This study selected cities above the “alpha” level in the Globalization and World Cities Research Network rankings as samples to examine the relationship between local demand and urban tourism competitiveness mediated by the quality of place. Results showed that the relationship between urban wealth and tourist arrivals was completely mediated by the quality of place, while the mediating effect was not significant in the relationship between urban wealth and per capita tourism spending, though per capita tourism spending was directly and positively associated with urban wealth. In other words, richer cities had a higher quality of place, and a higher quality of place attracted more tourists but did not increase tourism per capita spending. Furthermore, the study found that there were two opposite influence paths of city size on urban tourism competitiveness. Although urban tourism competitiveness was directly and positively affected by population, the population had a significant negative effect on urban tourism competitiveness mediated by the quality of place. Through the quality of place, we can be aware of the indirect negative effect suppressed by the direct positive effect. This study revealed that the quality of place helped to better understand the competitiveness of urban tourism.

Highlights

  • This study focuses on urban tourism competitiveness which is a critical aspect of tourism destination competitiveness (TDC) research

  • We introduced the quality of place as a mediating variable to determine the impact of the local population and income level on TDC

  • As one of the main goals of this study is to examine the quality of place as an intervening mechanism between local demand and TDC, we needed to perform a mediation analysis to analyze the indirect effect between the predictors and the outcome

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Theorizing the framework of destination competitiveness has been the main focus of tourism destination competitiveness (TDC) studies in the last two decades (Crouch and Ritchie, 1999; Dwyer et al, 2004; Enright and Newton, 2004, 2005; Assaker et al, 2013; Kruger and Heath, 2013; Cvelbar et al, 2016; Mendola and Volo, 2017; Fernández et al, 2020). Other studies examined different determinants of TDC (Cvelbar et al, 2016), namely, smart applications of technology in destination management (Boes et al, 2016; Koo et al, 2016); macroeconomy influencing TDC through public goods such as the environment and infrastructure (Mihalic, 2000; Assaker et al, 2013); the effect of sustainable indicators in TDC (Cucculelli and Goffi, 2016); policy and planning factors influencing TDC (Zehrer and Hallmann, 2015); and the impact of globalization on TDC (Ivanov and Webster, 2013) These studies further complemented the comprehensive and multidimensional studies by providing nuanced insights into tourism destinations’ competitiveness of different scales and characters

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call