Abstract
For time-independent materials which undergo non-linear deformations from some given reference configuration two (dual) hypotheses are considered. Firstly it is supposed that the work done to a given state of deformation is bounded below and that the bound is attainable on a physically possible path; secondly that the complementary work to a given state of stress is bounded above and that this bound too is attainable on a physically possible path. The consequences of these assumptions are analysed, and the results of Ponter and Martin [1] in the linear theory are generalized to account for non-linear deformations, due attention being paid to questions of stability.A non-linear elastic comparison material is defined whose strain energy is equal to the work done on a minimum path for the time-independent material. Extremum principles for non-linear elastic materials given in [2] are then applied to the comparison elastic material, and bounds are thereby placed on the work and complementary-work functional of the time-independent material. Corresponding overall properties of the time-independent and elastic materials are then compared by defining respective overall constitutive laws and overall stress and deformation variables.Following the definition of strengthening (weakening) of a non-linear elastic solid given by Ogden[2] a time-independent material is said to be strengthened (weakened) when its comparison elastic material is strengthened (weakened). Local and overall aspects of this definition are examined.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call