Abstract
Media interest in science and technology (S and T) and S and T funding policy increased threefold from 1983 to 1987. This was largely brought about by scientists speaking out about how funding cuts adversely affected their work. However, while the cuts were still seen to be in the public interest, the government paid little heed to those protests. When the economic rationale for the cuts was discredited; when scientists spoke out against the effects on areas other than their own disciplines, and when scientists associated with the ALP criticised government policy, then the politicians took notice, as evidenced by the May 1989 Science and Technology Statement. This required a unified lobby. Lobbying for science needs to be accurate. Realistic goals and time frames have to be set. Unrealistic expectations lead to disillusionment and withdrawal of support.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.