Abstract

Chachapoyas was one of the largest prehispanic cultures located in the eastern montane forest. The location on the interface of Andean and Amazonian environments gave middle-man status in trading important exotic goods withneighbors. The nature of the interface with the Chachapoyanos eastern neighbors speaks to important aspects of Chachapoya identity in the past. If Chachapoyas was an extension of highland cultural hegemony, then the eastern Chachapoyas interface may have been an important location for boundary maintenance between «Andean» and «Amazonian» peoples. Conversely, the Chachapoya may have been a bridge society that facilitated interaction by presenting a mutually intelligible venue for exchange. The LIP sites in the Mendoza region share many characteristics with typical Chachapoya sites: settlement pattern; pottery styles; and mortuary style, but Mendoza sites lack elaboration of household architecture, such as cornices, friezes, tenon heads, or platform bases, and these sites do not have the same density of stone constructions as documented at most “Classic” Chachapoya sites. This article reviews survey of Mendoza area habitation sites, mortuary sites, and pathways of movement as part of a network of local, regional, and interregional connections to consider what Mendoza sites can tell us about the construction of what was «Chachapoyas.»

Highlights

  • of the largest prehispanic cultures located in the eastern montane forest

  • e nature of the interface with the Chachapoyanos eastern neighbors speaks to important aspects of Chachapoya identity

  • If Chachapoyas was an extension of highland cultural hegemony

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chachapoyas was one of the largest prehispanic cultures located in the eastern montane forest. e location on the interface of Andean and Amazonian environments gave middle-man status in trading important exotic goods with neighbors. El sistema vial inka en casi todo el imperio probablemente se basaba en rutas existentes en el Período Intermedio Tardío, o incluso antes (Hyslop 1984: 270-274), por lo que estas rutas hacia el Este deben haber sido también importantes para los Chachapoyas.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.