Abstract

This study explores the factors of livelihood assets possessed by small farm households in Central Khyber Pakhtunkhwa of Pakistan that determines the livelihood outcomes using sustainable livelihood framework. Primary data were collected from 349 small farm households using well-structured pre-tested questionnaire having both closed and open-ended questions. The study first measured the livelihood assets worth through composite indices followed by the factors that influencing the livelihood outcomes using multiple regression model. The overall value of livelihood assets of small farm households in the study area was 0.297. The area small farmers were lacked in livelihood assets along with low level of living standards as well as economic development in the area. The empirical findings of regression model revealed that all the five capitals of livelihood asset had significant positive effect on livelihood outcomes. Additionally, household active labour and education of labor earners of human capital, family land of natural capital; livestock and access to formal financial credit of financial capital, distance to public services of physical capital and membership in MFSCs, access to service providers of social capital had significant positive effect on the livelihood outcomes. The study suggests that the livelihood asset should be upgraded in all capitals followed by changing the approach of agriculture departments and other allied stakeholders for developing agriculture sector and rural economy.

Highlights

  • Asset are the households’ endowment of resources that makes living

  • This study explores the factors of livelihood assets possessed by small farm households in Central Khyber Pakhtunkhwa of Pakistan that determines the livelihood outcomes using sustainable livelihood framework

  • The study results indicated that financial capital of livelihood asset had significant positive effect on livelihood output (Table 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Asset are the households’ endowment of resources that makes living. Its acquirement or creation needs time and money investments (Galab et al, 2006). Five capitals of asset (Human, Natural, Financial, Physical and Social) are identified by The Department for International Development (DFID) that represents the building blocks of livelihood. These capitals could be partially substituted for each other. Being people first and foremost, the livelihood approach is deemed for necessitating on choices of capitals for positive livelihood outcomes. A single category of capital is not enough for yielding the entire and different livelihood outcomes that people seek (DFID, 1999 a, b, c)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call