Liquid limit of low- to medium-plasticity soils: comparison between Casagrande cup and cone penetrometer test

Abstract

For liquid limit determination, the European Standards require the cone penetrometer technique or, alternatively, the Casagrande cup method; but the latter is widely used in practice. As most European soil classification systems are not adapted to the new European Standards, a systematic study was carried out to verify the differences between the two techniques for liquid limit determination, examining clayey soils from various geologic units. Comparison of 100 liquid limit values ranging between 20 and 50% indicates that the liquid limit obtained by the fall cone method is generally 2.2% points higher than that obtained by the hard base Casagrande apparatus. Comparison of data from different sources consistently indicates that the equation proposed in this study may be useful in revising existing soil classification systems, avoiding problems of soil classification due to the technique used for liquid limit determination.