Abstract

We evaluated the biological basis of reduced fat gain by oleoylethanolamide (OEA) in high-fat-fed mice and sought to determine how degradation of OEA affected its efficiency by comparing its effects to those of KDS-5104, a nonhydrolyzable lipid OEA analog. Mice were given OEA or KDS-5104 by the oral route (100 mg/kg body weight). Sixty-eight variables per mouse, describing six biological processes (lipid transport, lipogenesis, energy intake, energy expenditure, endocannabinoid signaling, and glucose metabolism), spanning gene expression of biochemical and physiological parameters were examined to determine the primary target whereby OEA reduces fat gain. Although KDS-5104 but not OEA was resistant to fatty acid amide hydrolase hydrolysis, OEA was degraded by an unidentified hydrolysis system in the liver. Nevertheless, both compounds equally decreased body fat pads after 5 weeks (20%; P < 0.05). The six biological functions constructed from the 68 initial variables predicted up to 58% of adipose fat variations. Lipid transport appeared central to the explanation for body fat deposition (16%; P < 0.0001), in which decreased expression of the FAT/CD36 gene was the component most related to adipose depots. Lipid transport appears to be a determinant player in the OEA fat-lowering response, with adipose tissue FAT/CD36 expression being the most relevant bioindicator of OEA action.

Highlights

  • We evaluated the biological basis of reduced fat gain by oleoylethanolamide (OEA) in high-fat-fed mice and sought to determine how degradation of OEA affected its efficiency by comparing its effects to those of KDS-5104, a nonhydrolyzable lipid OEA analog

  • fatty acid ethanolamide (FAE) are formed in vivo from N-acetylated phosphatidylethanolamine derivatives and broken down by two different enzymes, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) [1] and N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase (NAAA) [2,3,4]

  • Body weight gain started to shift from control mice from 3 weeks onward after supplementation with either OEA or KDS-5104 (Fig. 2), resulting in a significant and similar decrease in body weight gain after 5 weeks’ administration of OEA (Ϫ6%, P = 0.0029) and KDS-5104 (Ϫ7%, P = 0.010) (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We evaluated the biological basis of reduced fat gain by oleoylethanolamide (OEA) in high-fat-fed mice and sought to determine how degradation of OEA affected its efficiency by comparing its effects to those of KDS-5104, a nonhydrolyzable lipid OEA analog. KDS-5104 but not OEA was resistant to fatty acid amide hydrolase hydrolysis, OEA was degraded by an unidentified hydrolysis system in the liver Both compounds decreased body fat pads after 5 weeks (20%; P < 0.05). Lipid transport function is the main target of oral oleoylethanolamide to reduce adiposity in high-fat fed mice. The most abundant FAEs, found in biological tissues such as brain and neuronal cells, are anandamide and oleoylethanolamide (OEA). A direct evaluation of OEA on whole-body energy expenditure (EE) has remained unexplored

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call