Abstract

It has been known for some time that batches of the secondary explosive RDX from different manufacturers show significant variation in their shock sensitivity. No clear correlation between shock sensitivity and either chemical composition or morphology has been identified. As yet no comprehensive study has been reported covering RDX from different manufacturers, different production methods, and different particle sizes. In this work we use a range of techniques to study the morphology of RDX grains more closely and to assess which hotspot mechanisms might be dominant. Crystals were characterised using mercury porosimetry, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) and optical microscopy. This range of methods yields quantitative data on internal void size and number and surface porosity. Shock sensitivity is quantified using small‐scale gap tests and these demonstrate clear differences in sensitivity between batches from different manufacturers. The samples used are from three manufacturers, produced by both the Woolwich and Bachmann processes, and of two different sizes, so a comprehensive study of how morphology might affect hotspot formation is possible.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.