Abstract

Individual differences in preschoolers’ theory of mind (ToM) development were studied in relation to parents’ preferences for using mental state language in conversations with their child in 121 German families from two different socioeconomic (SES) levels in a 3-phase longitudinal design. We also cross-sectionally tested 47 Australian mother-child dyads to explore similarities and differences to the German sample and to validate a shortened version of the Maternal Mentalistic Input Inventory (MMSII: Peterson & Slaughter, 2003). Results made a number of novel contributions. For the German sample SES contrasts in children’s ToM development were evident at all three longitudinal measurement points. Furthermore, results for the middle SES German and Australian groups replicated past studies in showing links between parents’ self-reported use of elaborated mentalistic conversation and children’s higher ToM scores. Additional longitudinal analyses for the German sample revealed contrasting effects of parents’ preferences for the use of elaborated versus simple non-elaborated mental state language according to SES. Lower SES German children gained ToM understanding at a faster rate from age 3 to age 5 when their parents showed a high preference for using non-elaborated mental state language. By contrast, in middle-class German families, a high preference for causally elaborated mental state language was positively linked with children’s developmental path of ToM. These associations between parental conversational style and children’s ToM varying with SES were discussed in terms of their implications both for developmental theory and for future research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.