Abstract

Interpreting the development trajectories of Tbilisi, Yerevan, and Baku requires a careful understanding of the urban policies that have shaped them from the post-Soviet period to the present. The neoliberal approach has shaped their growth, encouraging the emergence of private, including international, entrepreneurial groups and the formation of a new urban market. Still, the resulting construction of infrastructure and living spaces has followed very different paths linked to specific socio-economic contexts. The article aims to explore the similarities and differences between the cities, trying to explain the incidence of political events and economic programmes in urban regeneration and the contentious and poorly managed dialogue with residents.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.