Abstract

Abstract : Theoretical and test data are presented for two methods of predicting fatigue life. The first method requires preknowledge of stress concentration and nominal stress; the second requires preknowledge of neither. Both employ smooth specimen S-N curves and consider effects of stresses at a concentration. The first method, the linear strain theory, assumes that strain at the concentration is proportional to load within practical limits. Stress at the concentration, including residual stress, can therefore be obtained from conventional stress-strain curves, and these stresses are then used in conjunction with S-N curves to evaluate fatigue life. The second method, the Smith method, requires the life of a given structure in terms of a loading that is sufficiently high to ensure local yielding, which corresponds to a lifetime of less than 10,000 cycles for 7075-T6 and 40,000 cycles for 2024-T3. The unique feature of the latter method is that it does not require knowledge of either nominal stresses or stress at the concentration, stress at the concentration being obtained directly from smooth specimen test data for the material from which the structure is fabricated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.