Abstract

Increased attention for indigenous rights in relation to nature conservation has in the Philippines resulted in legislation formalizing indigenous peoples’ participation in protected area management. We discuss the implementation of this legislation, based on the case of the Agta inhabiting the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park. The Agta are hunter-gatherers who settle along the coasts and rivers of northeast Luzon. Being indigenous to the park, they hold one third of the seats in its management board. However, our content analysis of this management board’s meetings, combined with qualitative observations of the Agta’s position in the park, show that their participation in its management is hampered by socio-cultural, practical, financial and political barriers. We demonstrate that formalizing indigenous participation in protected area management is not enough to break through existing power structures that inhibit marginalized stakeholders to defense of their interests in natural resources against those of more powerful actors.

Highlights

  • The position of indigenous peoples in protected areas is a widely discussed topic in academic and policy debates on conservationT

  • The Agta are only one among several stakeholder groups in the park’s natural resources, we focus on their participation in park management for the following reasons

  • Use is made of the results of a project that we initiated in 2006, which aimed to maximize the participation of the Agta in the Protected Area Management Board

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The position of indigenous peoples in protected areas is a widely discussed topic in academic and policy debates on conservation. T. Sunderland Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia and development (Naughton-Treves et al 2005; Agrawal and Redford 2009). The insight that biodiversity rich areas tend to overlap with areas inhabited by indigenous peoples (Kemf 1993; Posey 1999; Gorenflo et al 2012) and criticism of the injustice done to indigenous populations in the context of top-down, centralistic conservation schemes (Colchester 2003; Chapin 2004) have given rise to the notion that conservation of cultural and biological diversity need to be related processes (West et al 2006; Adams and Hutton 2007: 162–3; Pilgrim and Pretty 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call