Limits of permissible intervention in biomedical studies of somatic human rights

Abstract

The article examines the features of the essence and content of the constitutional principles of human rights as a basis for legalregulation of biomedical research of somatic human rights. The author reveals the essence and content of international and nationallegal principles of human biomedical research. It was found that there are currently no standards of legal regulation of human rightsprotection during biomedical research at the national level and at the level of international acts in this field. It is pointed out that theissue of human and civil rights and freedoms in the conditions of formation and development of civil society in democratic states occupiesa central place. It is established that the effective provision of constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen is associatedwith the need for restrictions in their implementation. It is determined that it is of fundamental importance that the attitude to law, tohuman rights and freedoms for the Ukrainian legal consciousness is impossible only through the awareness of a certain moral ideal asa goal in one’s own life. Therefore, any legal problem for the Ukrainian mentality is inextricably linked with the values of goodnessand justice, truth and humanity.It is noted that the approaches to the definition of “freedom” have both common and different features or certain clarificationsregarding certain manifestations. Without resorting to controversy about the truth or falsity of each of them, by generalizing their content,we can conclude that freedom, on the one hand, is an action according to their own desires, on the other - an action against them.The limits of permissible intervention in conducting biomedical research with human participation have been studied, as well asthe ethical examination of biomedical research as a way to protect human rights has been determined.