Abstract
SUMMARY 1 FST hemispheres have been proposed as a method for assessing flow characteristics near the river bottom. We suspected that the hemispheres were too big for this goai and that the ground plate would significantly affect near-bottom microhydraulics. 2 The results we present have confirmed our assumption about the limitations of this method: the correlation between FST results and current velocity (measured by an anemometer, φ= 1.2cm) was best at 40% of depth (‘mean current velocity’, coefficient of determination r2= 0,58) and decreased to r2= 0.24 at 0.6 cm above the bottom; the correlation with (calculated) shear stress was only r2= 0.23. A correlation between FST results and macroinvertebrate abundance was found for only four of eight investigated taxa and was similar to the correlation between abundance and ‘mean current velocity’. 3 We conclude that for fieldwork the FST hemispheres have about the same limitations as has a conventional (i.e. propeller-type) anemometer. With the hemispheres we could not obtain better data than with other methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
