Abstract
SUMMARY FST hemispheres have been proposed as a method for assessing flow characteristics near the river bottom. We suspected that the hemispheres were too big for this goai and that the ground plate would significantly affect near‐bottom microhydraulics. The results we present have confirmed our assumption about the limitations of this method: the correlation between FST results and current velocity (measured by an anemometer, φ= 1.2cm) was best at 40% of depth (‘mean current velocity’, coefficient of determination r2= 0,58) and decreased to r2= 0.24 at 0.6 cm above the bottom; the correlation with (calculated) shear stress was only r2= 0.23. A correlation between FST results and macroinvertebrate abundance was found for only four of eight investigated taxa and was similar to the correlation between abundance and ‘mean current velocity’. We conclude that for fieldwork the FST hemispheres have about the same limitations as has a conventional (i.e. propeller‐type) anemometer. With the hemispheres we could not obtain better data than with other methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
