Abstract

In uni-dimensional policy space, the median voter theorem provides a unique equilibrium characterization under simple majority rule. But for general decision procedures, the core is generically non-unique. We make a selection from the core by taking the limit equilibrium of a standard bargaining game as players become perfectly patient. Our refinement is characterized by asymmetric Nash bargaining with endogenous bargaining weights, between two players whose identities depend on the decision rule. The limit policy often (but not always) coincides with the ideal policy of some agent, not necessarily the median. The model provides foundations for endogenous separation of agents into cohesive voting blocs represented by non-median factional leaders.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.