Abstract

A number of South American countries experienced turbulent democratic, political and economic upheaval over the last 40 years in the form of coup d’états in the 1970s, tumultuous elections, and repeated severe economic crises, some of which happened fairly recently. Starting in 2010, a number of court proceedings across the region have made past military coup d’états the focus of national conversations. South American citizens may, therefore, have lost confidence in national institutions that have repeatedly disappointed their trust and expectations; a situation with potentially detrimental effects on their well-being. Using eight waves of the Gallup World Poll collected between 2009 and 2016 across ten South American countries, we investigate to what extent people’s confidence in financial institutions, the honesty of elections, the military, the judicial system, the national government and the police is associated with people’s current and expectation of future life satisfaction. We find that people who report confidence in these six institutions rate their current and expected life satisfaction, on average, to be higher than those who lack these types of institutional confidence, even after controlling for demographic factors and macroeconomic indicators. In addition, we investigate changes over time for all six measures of confidence in institutions as well as for current and expectation of future life satisfaction. Our results suggest that governments’ investments in well-functioning institutions may contribute positively to subjective well-being in a society. However, our analysis is correlational and we thus cannot rule out reverse causality.

Highlights

  • What happened to people’s confidence in national institutions in South America between 2009 and 2016? Given South America’s turbulent economic and political history it can be expected that confidence in institutions has been volatile over time

  • Do changes in confidence in national institutions matter for a society? To investigate this question, we will look at associations between confidence in six national institutions and subjective well-being in South America

  • The present study focuses on subjective well-being and its association with six self-reported measures that may serve as indicators of government quality, namely people’s confidence in six national institutions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

What happened to people’s confidence in national institutions in South America between 2009 and 2016? Given South America’s turbulent economic and political history it can be expected that confidence in institutions has been volatile over time. The present study focuses on subjective well-being and its association with six self-reported measures that may serve as indicators of government quality, namely people’s confidence in six national institutions. We first examine trajectories of confidence in six national institutions and subjective well-being in ten South American countries over time and, second, discuss associations between these measures. The results further show a significant downward trend in subjective wellbeing during the same time period Confidence in these six national institutions is significantly positively associated with individual subjective well-being. Economic and political determinants of subjective well-being that have previously been investigated include GDP, government quality, satisfaction with democratic processes and different types of polices (Dorn et al 2007; Helliwell and Huang 2008); we will discuss each one in turn below. Does not ‘improve the human lot’ (Easterlin 1974), do any other macro-level factors affect subjective well-being? How well a government functions and provides essential services for its citizens, may be more crucial for individual well-being

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call