Life Prediction of Gas Turbine Materials

Abstract

The advance of gas turbine engines and the increase in fuel efficiency over the past 50 years relies on the development of high temperature materials with the performance for the intended services. The cutaway view of an aero engine is shown in Fig. 1. During the service of an aero engine, a multitude of material damage such as foreign object damage, erosion, high cycle fatigue, low cycle fatigue, fretting, hot corrosion/oxidation, creep, and thermomechanical fatigue will be induced to the components ranging from fan/compressor sections up front to high pressure (HP) and low pressure (LP) turbine sections at the rear. The endurance of the gas turbine engine to high temperature is particularly marked by the creep resistance of HP turbine blade alloy. Figure 2 shows the trend of firing temperature and turbine blade alloy capability (Schilke, 2004). Nowadays, the state-of-the-art turbine blade alloys are single crystal Ni-base superalloys, which are composed of intermetallic γ’ (Ni3Al) precipitates in a solution-strengthened γ matrix, solidified in the [100] crystallographic direction. Turbine disc alloys are also mostly polycrystalline Ni-base superalloys, produced by wrought or powder metallurgy processes. Compressor materials can range from steels to titanium alloys, depending on the cost or weight-saving concerns in land and aero applications. Coatings are often applied to offer additional protection from thermal, erosive and corrosive attacks. In general, the advances in gas turbine materials are often made through thermomechanical treatments and/or compositional changes to suppress the failure modes found in previous services, since these materials inevitably incur service-induced degradation, given the hostile (hot and corrosive) operating environment. Therefore, the potential failure mechanisms and lifetimes of gas turbine materials are of great concern to the designers, and the hot-section components are mostly considered to be critical components from either safety or maintenance points of view. Because of its importance, the methodology of life prediction has been under development for many decades (see reviews by Viswanathan, 1989; Wu et al., 2008). The early approaches were mainly empirically established through numerous material and component tests. However, as the firing temperatures are increased and the operating cycles become more complicated, the traditional approaches are too costly and time-consuming to keep up with the fast pace of product turn-around for commercial competition. The challenges in life prediction for gas turbine components indeed arise due to their severe operating conditions: high mechanical loads and temperatures in a high-speed corrosive/erosive gaseous environment. The combination of thermomechanical loads and a hostile environment may induce a multitude of material damages including low-cycle fatigue, creep, fretting and oxidation. Gas turbine designers need analytical methods to extrapolate the limited material