Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning

Robert Frazier,Enze Jin,Ajay Kumar

doi:10.3390/en8010621

Abstract

Biomass gasification has the potential to produce renewable fuels, chemicals and power at large utility scale facilities. In these plants catalysts would likely be used to reform and clean the generated biomass syngas. Traditional catalysts are made from transition metals, while catalysts made from biochar are being studied. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed to analyze the sustainability, via impact assessments, of producing a metal catalyst versus a dedicated biochar catalyst. The LCA results indicate that biochar has a 93% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and requires 95.7% less energy than the metal catalyst to produce. The study also estimated that biochar production would also have fewer impacts on human health (e.g., carcinogens and respiratory impacts) than the production of a metal catalyst. The possible disadvantage of biochar production in the ecosystem quality is due mostly to its impacts on agricultural land occupation. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess environmental impacts of variability in the two production systems. In the metal catalyst manufacture, the extraction and production of nickel (Ni) had significant negative effects on the environmental impacts. For biochar production, low moisture content (MC, 9%) and high yield type (8 tons/acre) switchgrass appeared more sustainable.

Highlights

Biomass can be converted into solid, liquid and gaseous fuel products through either biological or various thermochemical processes [1,2]
A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to model the environmental impact of producing metal versus biochar as a catalyst used in the syngas cleaning system
The LCA results showed that production of biochar requires 95.7% less energy than production of the metal catalyst which is a mixture of nickel oxide (NiO)

Summary

Introduction

Biomass can be converted into solid, liquid and gaseous fuel products through either biological or various thermochemical processes [1,2]. One of the technologies that utilize biomass is gasification, a thermochemical process [3] This process has gathered renewed interest because it is typically more efficient than other thermochemical processes and has potential to be commercially feasibl e in near-term for energy and fuels production [4]. This greater efficiency translates into lower emissions per mega joule of energy produced. Studies indicate an integrated biomass gasification combined cycle (IGCC) electrical power production plant with CO2 removal could mitigate CO2 emissions by 76%–79% compared to a conventional coal IGCC power plant [5].

Methods

Results

Conclusion