Life cycle assessment of a rainwater harvesting system compared with an AC condensate harvesting system

Ashley Edelen,John M Johnston,Jay Garland,Santosh R Ghimire,Michael Jahne,Xin (Cissy) Ma

doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.043

Ashley Edelen, John M Johnston + Show 4 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.043

Copy DOI

Abstract

This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a rainwater harvesting (RWH) system and an air-conditioning condensate harvesting (ACH) system for non-potable water reuse. U.S. commercial buildings were reviewed to design rooftop RWH and ACH systems for one- to multi-story buildings’ non-potable water demand. A life cycle inventory was compiled from the U.S. EPA’s database. Nine scenarios were analyzed, including baseline RWH system, ACH system, and combinations of the two systems adapted to 4-story and 19-story commercial buildings in San Francisco and a 4-story building in Washington, DC. Normalization of 11 life cycle impact assessment categories showed that RWH systems in 4-story buildings at both locations outperformed ACH systems (45–80% of ACH impacts) except equivalent in Evaporative Water Consumption. However, San Francisco’s ACH system in 19-story building outperformed the RWH system (51–83% of RWH impacts) due to the larger volume of ACH collection, except equivalent in Evaporative Water Consumption. For all three buildings, the combined system preformed equivalently to the better-performing option (≤4–8% impact difference compared to the maximum system). Sensitivity analysis of the volume of water supply and building occupancy showed impact-specific results. Local climatic conditions, rainfall, humidity, water collections and demands are important when designing building-scale RWH and ACH systems. LCA models are transferrable to other locations with variable climatic conditions for decision-making when developing and implementing on-site non-potable water systems.

Highlights

71% of irrigated areas and 47% of large cities (> 500,000 inhabitants) are reported to experience periodic, annual, seasonal, or dry year water shortages (Brauman et al, 2016)
The variation in rainwater harvesting (RWH) and air-conditioning condensate harvesting (ACH) collections, by month, suggested a combined system of RWH and AC condensate to ensure that water demands are met throughout the year and to maximize storage tank usefulness
The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) values of combined system were equivalent to the better-performing option (≤4–8% impact difference compared to the maximum system)

Summary

Introduction

71% of irrigated areas and 47% of large cities (> 500,000 inhabitants) are reported to experience periodic, annual, seasonal, or dry year water shortages (Brauman et al, 2016). Some examples are rainwater harvesting (RWH); atmospheric water harvesting that includes air-conditioning (AC) condensate water, atmospheric water generation from desert air with low relative humidity to 20% (Kim et al, 2017; Fathieh et al, 2018), and fog water collection; as well as on-site gray water treatment and reuse (USEPA, 2012; Schoen et al, 2015). Condensate is water collected on a cool surface such as that in the evaporator section of the air-handling unit (AHU) of a Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) System (Glawe, 2013). AC condensate and rainwater can be used for make-up water in cooling towers, in addition to other non-potable uses such as toilet and urinal flushing, irrigation, ornamental water features, and manufacturing processes (Glawe, 2013; Ghimire et al, 2014). Most cooling systems in U.S buildings are Packaged Air Conditioning Units (37%) and Residential-Type Central Air Conditioners (30%) (EIA, 2016)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion