Abstract
Abstract The structural characteristics of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data are increasingly used to classify urban environments at fine scales, but have been underutilized for distinguishing heterogeneous land covers over large urban regions due to high cost, limited spectral information, and the computational difficulties posed by inherently large data volumes. Here we explore tradeoffs between potential gains in mapping accuracy with computational costs by integrating structural and intensity surface models extracted from LiDAR data with Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery and evaluating the degree to which TM, LiDAR, and LiDAR-TM fusion data discriminated land covers in the rapidly urbanizing region of Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. Using supervised maximum likelihood (ML) and classification tree (CT) methods, we classified TM data at 30 m and LiDAR data and LiDAR-TM fusions at 1 m, 5 m, 10 m, 15 m and 30 m resolutions. We assessed the relative contributions of LiDAR structural and intensity surface models to classification map accuracy and identified optimal spatial resolution of LiDAR surface models for large-area assessments of urban land cover. ML classification of 1 m LiDAR-TM fusions using both structural and intensity surface models increased total accuracy by 32% compared to LiDAR alone and by 8% over TM at 30 m. Fusion data using all LiDAR surface models improved class discrimination of spectrally similar forest, farmland, and managed clearings and produced the highest total accuracies at 1 m, 5 m, and 10 m resolutions (87.2%, 86.3% and 85.4%, respectively). At all resolutions of fusion data and using either ML or CT classifier, the relative contribution of the LiDAR structural surface models (canopy height and normalized digital surface model) to classification accuracy is greater than the intensity surface. Our evaluation of tradeoffs between data volume and thematic map accuracy for this study system suggests that a spatial resolution of 5 m for LiDAR surface models best balances classification performance and the computational challenges posed by large-area assessments of land cover.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Light Detection And Ranging Data
Light Detection And Ranging
Surface Models
Thematic Mapper
Fusion Data
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Remote Sensing
Dec 22, 2015
Ecological Indicators
Feb 1, 2017
Jun 8, 2021
Jun 8, 2021
Jun 14, 2010
Remote Sensing
Dec 7, 2021
Journal of Field Archaeology
Nov 1, 2012
Landscape and Ecological Engineering
Apr 14, 2011
Remote Sensing
Jan 8, 2020
Forests
Nov 26, 2020
Remote Sensing of Environment
Nov 1, 2007
Archaeological Prospection
Jun 16, 2022
Remote Sensing
Mar 30, 2018
Jun 19, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Dec 1, 2023