Abstract

Disagreement between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the Constitution hinged largely on empirical expectations regarding the ability of the proposed system of government to promote civic allegiance. I examine the views of allegiance offered by major Anti-Federalists and the political psychology on which they are based. I conclude, first, that Anti-Federalist political psychology is flawed, leaving the Constitution's opponents vulnerable to charges made by the authors of The Federalist, among others, that sound functioning and durability of government, rather than size, are sufficient to generate civic allegiance. Second, the Anti-Federalists' positions on allegiance are grounded in liberal first principles of government. The arguments offered are not those one would expect if the Anti-Federalists adhered strongly to the tenets of civic humanism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.