Abstract
Normative analysis found that for the application of liability for transboundary damage to genetically modified organisms, there are currently three liability patterns: traditional state liability, private law liability, and liability for transboundary damage. It will not be an effective solution to the problem of penalty for damages, if the above liability patterns apply to transboundary damage of genetically modified organisms separately. And this approach is inconsistent with the legal principles of relevant international law and judicial practice. So this article uses method of legal interpretation to analyze and interpret the provisions of Convention on Biological Diversity, The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol to clarify the true meaning of the provisions in depth, and eliminate errors and omissions. At the same time, this article uses the method of theoretical analysis to analyze the existing liability patterns. Finally, we found, the principle of timely and adequate compensation for victims should be implemented in complex realities, and genetically modified damage should be dealt with and in accordance with the attributes of damage, causation and other factors. According to these factors, we will divide transboundary damage of genetically modified organisms into three types: intentional transboundary movement, unintentional transboundary movement and illegal transboundary movement. To divide the transboundary damage to genetically modified organisms and apply different liability patterns according to different situations should be the best approach.
Highlights
Modified organisms refer to gene sequences that contain and express genes from other species
Article 27 of The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety clarifies that the “Supplementary Protocol” is an international rule applicable to compensation and remedies for damage caused by the transboundary movement of genetically modified organisms
The foregoing and related legal documents have made a variety of distinctions between transboundary damages of genetically modified organisms, but what is related to the liability for transboundary damage of genetically modified organisms is the distinction between intentional transboundary movement, unintentional transboundary movement and illegal transboundary movement (IUCN, 2003)
Summary
Modified organisms refer to gene sequences that contain and express genes from other species. Modified biotechnology has broad application prospects and has promoted major progress in the fields of medicine and agriculture These advancements may include new medical methods and vaccines, new industrial products, and better fibers and fuels. The supplementary protocol further clarifies this definition, increasing the damage caused by the transboundary movement of genetically modified organisms from non-parties, that is, the damage caused by the transboundary movement of genetically modified organisms between any countries. It should be regarded as transboundary damage of genetically modified organisms in the sense of international law. It is a feasible path to distinguish between various situations of transboundary damage of genetically modified organisms and apply different liabilities
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.