Abstract
Abstract t was originally hypothesized that loss of BRAF N-terminal negative regulatory domains, which are deleted in the KIAA1549:BRAF rearrangement, results in constitutive activation of the BRAF kinase. This model suggests that BRAF fusion partners are dispensable for BRAF oncogenic signaling. Paradoxically, our data suggest expression of truncated BRAF is insufficient for transformation and identify specific domains in KIAA1549 that are necessary for transformation. These domains are critical for regulating subcellular localization of the fusion protein and highlight an aberrant pattern of cellular localization that is not observed with wildtype BRAF. Altered subcellular localization results in proteolytic cleavage of KIAA1549:BRAF, and we identify the protease responsible for this cleavage event. This protease is therapeutically tractable and clinically relevant inhibitors have been developed, presenting a MAPK-independent mechanism to target the fusion. We also highlight an unexpected role for rare fusion partners, including FAM131B, in BRAF activation. In total, these data suggest that BRAF fusion partners are not indispensable for transformation as was previously thought, presenting unexplored opportunities to therapeutically target pLGG tumors with BRAF rearrangements. We are currently working on the IP measures required to disclose the specific enzyme(s) at ISPNO.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call