Abstract
Abstract In this paper, I will argue that Logics of Formal Inconsistency $(LFIs)$ can be used as very sophisticated and powerful methods of classical recapture. I will compare $LFIs$ with the well-known non-monotonic logics by Batens (2001, Log. Anal., 45–68) and Priest (2006, In Contradiction, Oxford University) and the ‘shrieking’ rules of Beall (2013, Rev. Symb. Log., 6, 755–764). I will show that these proposals can be represented in $LFIs$ and that $LFIs$ give room to more complex and varied recapturing strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
