Abstract

Developmental stuttering is a widely discussed speech fluency disorder. Research on its mechanism has focused on an atypical interface between the planning (PLAN) and execution (EX) processes, known collectively as the EXPLAN model. However, it remains unclear how this atypical interface influences people who stutter. A straightforward assumption is that stuttering speakers adopt a smaller scope of speech planning, whereas a defect in word retrieval can be confounding. To shed light on this issue, we took the semantic blocking effect as an index to examine lexical planning in word and phrase production. In Experiment 1, for word production, pictures from the same semantic category were combined to form homogeneous blocks, and pictures from different categories were combined to form heterogeneous blocks. A typical effect of semantic blocking showing longer naming latencies for homogeneous blocks than heterogeneous ones was observed for both stuttering and fluent speakers. However, this effect was smaller for stuttering speakers, when it was subject to lexical defects in stuttering. In Experiment 2, for a conjoined noun phrase production task, the pictures referring to the first noun were manipulated into homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions. The semantic blocking effect was also much smaller for stuttering speakers, indicating a smaller scope of lexical planning. Therefore, the results provided more evidence in support of the EXPLAN model and indicated that a smaller scope of lexical planning rather than lexical defects causes the atypical interface for stuttering. Moreover, a comparison between these two tasks showed that the study findings have implications for syntactic defects in stuttering.

Highlights

  • Speech communication is one of the most complex cognitive-motor activities that humans engage in

  • In Experiment 1, we tested whether the children who stutter (CWS) have defects in lexical selection by a word production task in the blockedcyclic naming paradigm

  • The results of naming latencies showed a semantic blocking effect for both CWS and children who do not stutter (CWNS), which was consistent with previous studies of blocked-cyclic naming paradigm (Damian et al, 2001; Belke et al, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Speech communication is one of the most complex cognitive-motor activities that humans engage in. Even simple speech requires the orchestration of high-level cognition, in the form of the intended message. These messages are mapped to corresponding lexical and phonological representations, which are expressed by precisely timed muscle contractions of the vocal articulators (Levelt, 1989; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004). This complexity provides many opportunities for speech to fail, which is evident in developmental stuttering and other speech disorders (Mock et al, 2016). People can generally recover from developmental stuttering without any intervention, but research has indicated that at age 12 and older, the severity ratings of recovered speakers and their dysfluency counts drop (Howell et al, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.