Letter Regarding the Article by Xue et al, “Functional Integration of Electrically Active Cardiac Derivatives From Genetically Engineered Human Embryonic Stem Cells With Quiescent Recipient Ventricular Cardiomyocytes”

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

To the Editor: The article by Xue et al1 on human embryonic stem cell-derived pacemakers illustrates that embryonic stem cells differentiated into spontaneously beating cardiocytes may function as biological pacemakers and mentions a potential limitation: The intrinsic pacemaker rate was slower than desirable. They suggest that incorporating HCN pacemaker channel genes might achieve more desirable rates, an idea consistent with our published results using HCN2 in gene- and adult human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC)-based therapies.2–4 However, certain of the comments by Xue et al misinterpret our own work on HCN-loaded hMSCs. They state that “…these modified, undifferentiated, human mesenchymal stem cells are incapable of pacing quiescent cells because the former are neither electrically active nor genuine cardiac cells” (p 19). This statement suggests a misunderstanding of the rationale and underlying biophysics of the hMSC experiments. In fact, generation of pacemaker activity does not require delivery of an “excitable differentiated cardiac cell,” but only that the delivered cell (1) carry sufficient pacemaker current and (2) make gap junctions; thus, the hMSC-myocyte pair should behave as a pacemaker unit entirely equivalent to a single heart cell with substantial if. We clearly demonstrated both …