Abstract
This paper reviews the experience of introducing formal model-based design and code generation by means of the Simulink/Stateflow platform in the development process of a railway signalling manufacturer. Such company operates in a standard-regulated framework, for which the adoption of commercial, non qualified tools as part of the development activities poses hurdles from the verification and certification point of view. At this regard, three incremental intermediate goals have been defined, namely (1) identification of a safe-subset of the modelling language, (2) evidence of the behavioural conformance between the generated code and the modelled specification, and (3) integration of the modelling and code generation technologies within the process that is recommended by the regulations. These three issues have been addressed by progressively tuning the usage of the technologies across different projects. This paper summarizes the lesson learnt from this experience. In particular, it shows that formal modelling and code generation are actually powerful means to enhance product safety and cost effectiveness. Nevertheless, their adoption is not a straightforward step, and incremental adjustments and refinements are required in order to establish a formal model-based process.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
